We hope that readers will find the resulting essay, http://www.uel.ac.uk/risingeast/essays/2010-02-24.htm, just published in Rising East, a journal of the University of East London, of some interest. Alice Sampson (UEL) and I (LSBU) have developed the essay following a Conference organised under the aegis of the University of East London in June 2009. The Conference focused on ‘Community Anchors’ and included illuminating presentations from three such organisations: Bromley-by-Bow Centre; Community Links; and Toynbee Hall. A clear concern of all present was the difficulty of marshalling sufficient convincing evidence – beyond the anecdotal – of Community Anchors’ effectiveness as ‘whole organisations’ rather than as ‘delivery agents for particular services’.
The essay focuses on that challenging and seemingly intractable problem and seeks to make progress in its resolution. However, we do not claim that it is, in any sense, the ‘last word’. In the essay:
1. Community Anchors are defined as ‘multi-purpose’ and ‘locally-based’, with long term missions focused on ‘poverty’ and/or ‘social exclusion’ and/or ‘social capital’.
a. As such, they are at a great disadvantage in the predominantly silocentric funding world.
b. As service deliverers, Community Anchors suffer from diseconomies of small scale and organisational complexity.
c. By contrast, their strengths as ‘organisations making a distinctive and valuable long term contribution to their communities’ are difficult to demonstrate in ways that will convince funders.
d. ‘Whole organisation impact’ is especially difficult for multi-purpose organisations to demonstrate.
2. We argue that Community Anchors’ long term missions are likely to be being achieved if they can show – over time – that they are effective ‘attractors’ and ‘connectors’. These two mechanisms are vital to Community Anchors’ distinctiveness, which depends upon Community Anchors’ potential – as ‘whole organisations’ – to contribute more than ‘the sum of their service delivery parts’ to their communities.
3. The essay concludes with some indications as to how the effectiveness of these ‘attractor’ and ‘connector’ features might be measured. The essay sets Community Anchors in a wider context and so touches on – but does not bottom out – several other interesting and important questions. The fairly extensive endnotes give some indications as to how such issues might be taken further. We would welcome comments and contributions to what we believe is an important debate. We can be reached at: a.sampson@uel.ac.uk max.weaver@btinternet.com